DPM Monitoring for Construction Sites: What Builders and Site Managers Must Know in 2026

Construction sites across Australia that use diesel-powered equipment—particularly in enclosed or semi-enclosed environments—face a critical compliance challenge. The new workplace exposure limit (WEL) for diesel particulate matter (DPM) of 0.01 mg/m³ respirable equivalent concentration (REC), effective 1 December 2026, applies equally to construction workers as it does to miners or industrial operators.

For tunnelling projects, basement construction, and underground car park development, this standard represents a substantial step-change in the regulatory baseline. Many construction sites currently operating diesel generators, compactors, excavators, and concrete pumps in partially ventilated or confined spaces are unaware of the exposure risk or their legal obligations.

This guide explains your duty of care as a construction employer, outlines the specific environmental risks construction workers face, and provides practical strategies for DPM monitoring and control on temporary worksites.

Why Construction Sites Are a Hidden DPM Risk

Unlike mining operations where diesel equipment and underground work are expected and planned for, construction sites often treat DPM exposure as incidental—something that “happens naturally” without systematic assessment or control. Site-specific exposure assessment. This assumption is dangerous and increasingly indefensible under Australian health and safety law.

The Convergence of Risk Factors

Construction sites generate high DPM concentrations because several risk factors converge:

1. Temporary operations: Construction projects are temporary. Unlike a mine with permanent ventilation infrastructure, a construction site’s air handling may be improvised, inadequate, or non-existent.

2. Mixed equipment in confined spaces: A single site might have multiple diesel-powered machines (excavators, dump trucks, generators, compactors) operating simultaneously in a basement or tunnel, each discharging exhaust into the same confined air.

3. Limited ventilation planning: While modern construction projects include health and safety planning, environmental controls like ventilation are often treated as secondary to schedule and budget — a risk also identified in broader occupational hygiene assessments for the construction industry. Engineering controls for construction. Temporary ventilation systems (if provided) may not be adequately sized or maintained.

4. Worker proximity to equipment: Construction workers operating or working near diesel equipment are not always aware of exposure risk. A concrete pump operator standing downwind of a diesel generator exhaust, or a tunnelling crew working within 5 meters of a running compressor, experience peak exposures that far exceed the new WEL.

5. Cumulative exposure across roles: A construction worker might spend time on multiple tasks during a shift—operating an excavator, working in a basement zone, supervising concrete pumping—each contributing to total DPM exposure.

Why Construction Sites Were Overlooked Until Now

Historically, construction sites were not subject to the same DPM scrutiny as mining operations. Most Australian construction hygiene programs focused on dust (silica, asbestos, general construction dust) rather than diesel exhaust. The previous DPM limit of 0.1 mg/m³ was high enough that many construction sites fell below it, creating a false sense of safety.

The new 0.01 mg/m³ limit changes that calculus completely. Construction sites in tunnels, basements, or underground environments will struggle to achieve this limit without deliberate engineering controls.

The Highest-Risk Construction Environments

Not all construction sites face equal DPM risk. Understanding which environments generate the highest exposures helps target monitoring and control efforts.

Tunnelling Projects

Underground tunnelling is the highest-risk construction activity for DPM exposure in Australia today.

• Scale: Major Australian cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth) are investing in metro rail, road tunnel, and subway expansion projects. Melbourne DPM monitoring. DPM monitoring services in Sydney. These multi-year, multi-million-dollar projects operate diesel-powered excavators, rock bolting equipment, mucking trucks, and personnel carriers continuously.
• Confinement: Tunnel headings are sealed environments. Ventilation is supplied via temporary ducting but is often inadequate for the volume of diesel equipment operating simultaneously.
• Duration: Tunnelling is not episodic; it’s continuous. Workers spend full shifts in high-DPM environments, not brief exposures.
• Equipment concentration: Multiple diesel machines operate in a limited space (the tunnel heading and supporting areas).
• Exposure levels: Baseline monitoring at Australian tunnelling projects has documented DPM concentrations of 0.1–1.0 mg/m³, often 10–100 times the new WEL.

Major tunnelling projects (Sydney Metro, Melbourne Metro Tunnel, Brisbane metro extensions) are now conducting intensive DPM assessment and implementing controls in response to the new limit.

Basement and Underground Car Park Construction

Basement excavation and underground car park construction present similar confinement challenges to tunnelling, though usually on a smaller scale.

• Duration: Basement construction is often the longest phase of a multi-level building project, potentially lasting 12–18 months.
• Equipment use: Excavators, rock drilling, mucking trucks, and compressors operate in confined basement zones with temporary ventilation.
• Worker density: Basements may have dozens of workers in a small volume, all exposed to shared diesel exhaust.
• Ventilation limitations: Temporary ventilation ducting supplies air, but exhaust extraction is often overlooked, leading to accumulation.

Deep Foundation and Piling

Projects involving continuous flight auger (CFA) piling, diaphragm wall construction, or deep pile driving often use diesel compressors and generators in confined spaces (basement work areas, site compounds with limited airflow).

• Operator exposure: Pile rig operators and compressor attendants are positioned directly over or next to diesel exhaust sources.
• Site crew exposure: Other site personnel working nearby are exposed to drift and circulation of exhaust air.

Surface Construction with Temporary Diesel Equipment

While surface sites have better natural ventilation, temporary diesel equipment (generators for site power, compressors for tools) can create localized high-concentration zones.

• Generator stations: Site generators supplying power to multiple construction areas often vent in locations where site offices, tool stores, or worker gathering areas are downwind.
• Concrete pumping: Diesel-powered concrete pumps operating on-site can expose workers in the pump placement area and concrete placement zone.

What the December 2026 WEL Change Means for Construction Projects

The shift from 0.1 mg/m³ to 0.01 mg/m³ is not an incremental change; it’s a 10-fold reduction that will require construction sites to approach DPM as a priority hazard.

Immediate Regulatory Impact

From 1 December 2026:

• The new limit applies to all construction workplaces and all workers exposed to DPM.
• Non-compliance exposes construction employers to regulatory penalties (up to $600,000 for individuals, higher for bodies corporate under the WHS Act).
• Affected workers have a right to refuse work if they believe DPM exposure is creating an unsafe environment.
• Auditors and regulators will expect construction sites to demonstrate compliance through monitoring, controls, and documentation.

What “Compliance” Means for a Construction Site

Compliance does not mean “we hope exposure is below 0.01 mg/m³.” It means:

1. Documented assessment: You have identified all tasks and roles where DPM exposure is possible.
2. Monitoring data: You have conducted personal or area monitoring to quantify exposure levels.
3. Control implementation: You have implemented engineering, administrative, and work practice controls to minimize exposure.
4. Verification: You have repeated monitoring or continuous assessment to confirm controls are effective and exposures remain below the WEL.

For construction sites, this will require a shift in project planning and budgeting.

Projects with Existing Monitoring Data

If your construction company has baseline DPM monitoring from previous projects in similar environments (e.g., earlier phases of the same tunnelling project, or similar basement work), use that data to:

• Identify the exposure baseline without controls.
• Estimate the effectiveness of planned controls.
• Prioritize high-exposure tasks for monitoring and control.

For example, if a previous tunnelling project recorded 0.3–0.5 mg/m³ DPM in mucking areas (tripled the new limit), and you implemented equipment upgrades reducing it to 0.05 mg/m³, you know that similar controls on the current project can approach the new limit (though additional measures may still be needed).

Your Duty of Care: WHS Legal Obligations for Construction Employers

Australian construction employers operate under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (commonwealth framework, adopted and paralleled in all states). This Act imposes a clear and enforceable “duty of care” to manage occupational health hazards.

The Hierarchy of Controls

The WHS Act requires that construction employers eliminate or minimise risks “so far as reasonably practicable” (SFAIRP). This is implemented through a hierarchy of controls:

1. Elimination: Remove the hazard entirely (e.g., use battery electric equipment instead of diesel).
2. Engineering controls: Redesign the environment to reduce exposure (e.g., enhanced ventilation, equipment relocation, temporary enclosure modifications).
3. Administrative controls: Change work practices (e.g., job rotation, reduced operating time, improved maintenance).
4. Personal protective equipment (PPE): Issue respirators or other protective equipment as a last resort.

For DPM on construction sites, the WHS Act expects employers to have addressed elimination and engineering first. Relying on respirators alone is not compliant.

Specific Construction Obligations

• Pre-contract assessment: Before awarding a contract for work in confined spaces or with diesel equipment, include DPM assessment and controls in the contract specifications.
• Site induction: All workers on-site must receive induction content covering DPM hazards, controls in place, and their roles in minimizing exposure.
• Competent person oversight: At least one person on-site (site manager, health and safety representative, or designated worker) must be competent in DPM hazards and controls. This typically requires training or background in occupational hygiene.
• Health monitoring: Under WHS Regulations, workers at risk of occupational disease (including DPM-related respiratory disease) must be offered baseline and periodic health assessments. This includes chest X-rays, spirometry, and occupational physician evaluation as determined by risk assessment.
• Monitoring and review: Conduct documented DPM monitoring (personal or area) during high-risk phases of work. Review and update control measures based on monitoring results.

Documentation

Maintain a file for the project documenting:

• Initial DPM hazard assessment and control plan.
• Monitoring results (if monitoring is conducted).
• Equipment specifications (Tier rating, age, maintenance records).
• Ventilation system specifications and maintenance logs.
• Worker health monitoring results (kept confidential but counted as evidence of compliance).
• Corrective actions taken in response to monitoring or incidents.

This documentation demonstrates your duty of care and is essential if a regulator or court reviews your compliance.

Personal vs Area DPM Sampling: Which Does a Construction Site Need?

Understanding the difference between personal exposure monitoring (PEM) and area monitoring is critical for construction sites to design an effective and cost-efficient monitoring program.

Personal Exposure Monitoring (PEM)

Personal monitoring measures the actual inhalable DPM concentration in the breathing zone of an individual worker throughout their shift.

When to use:
– High-risk roles with prolonged equipment operation (excavator operators, mucking truck drivers, piling rig operators).
– Baseline assessment of a new site or project phase to quantify worker exposure.
– Verification monitoring after controls are implemented (to confirm effectiveness).

Advantages:
– Directly measures what workers are breathing.
– Identifies which roles have the highest exposure.
– Provides clear compliance/non-compliance data for individuals.

Disadvantages:
– More expensive per sample than area monitoring.
– Requires worker cooperation and willingness to wear samplers.
– Logistics on temporary sites can be challenging (ensuring samplers are returned, filters are logged, etc.).

Cost: $300–$600 per personal sample (including analysis).

Area Monitoring

Area monitoring places samplers at fixed points in the work environment to measure ambient DPM concentration.

When to use:
– Rapid screening to identify high-exposure zones on a large site.
– Ongoing monitoring during project phases (e.g., weekly area samples in the tunnel heading).
– Verification that ventilation or equipment changes have improved general air quality.

Advantages:
– Lower cost per sample.
– No worker inconvenience or logistics.
– Quick way to assess site-wide conditions.

Disadvantages:
– Does not directly measure worker exposure (area samples may over- or underestimate breathing zone exposure depending on worker location).
– Cannot identify differences between roles.
– Requires multiple fixed-point samples to characterize the whole site.

Cost: $200–$400 per area sample (including analysis).

Recommended Sampling Strategy for Construction Sites

For most construction projects, a tiered approach is most cost-effective:

1. Initial baseline (Month 1 of high-diesel-equipment phase): Conduct 2–3 personal samples of the highest-risk role (e.g., excavator operator) and 3–5 area samples at key points (heading face, mucking truck loading zone, ventilation exhaust outlet). Total cost: $2,000–$4,000.

2. Interpretation: If personal exposures are <0.02 mg/m³ and area samples show no hot-spots, controls are adequate; move to quarterly verification. If exposures are 0.02–0.1 mg/m³, implement incremental controls (ventilation improvement, equipment upgrade) and retest in 4–6 weeks. If exposures are >0.1 mg/m³, escalate controls immediately (temporary halt of equipment, rerouting ventilation, or equipment replacement).

3. Ongoing monitoring (Months 2–Project End): Monthly area samples at 2–3 fixed points, plus quarterly personal samples of high-risk roles. Total cost: $400–$800/month during the high-exposure phase.

4. Before handover: Final personal and area samples to document that controls are effective and on-site air quality is compliant.

When to Monitor: Planning DPM Assessment Around Your Project Lifecycle

DPM monitoring must be timed to correspond with project phases and equipment deployment. Monitoring after the fact, or at the very end of a project, is too late to modify controls.

Pre-Project Planning Phase (6 Months Before Mobilisation)

• Identify all planned diesel equipment and specifications (Tier rating, approximate hours of operation).
• Estimate equipment concentration in confined work zones.
• Review historical DPM data from similar projects (if available).
• Develop a preliminary DPM control plan and budget allocation for engineering controls.
• Specify Tier 4 Final engines for any new equipment procured.

Baseline Monitoring (First 2 Weeks of High-Diesel-Equipment Work)

• Deploy PEM and area sampling in early project phases before full equipment complement is operating.
• Establish exposure baseline with minimal operational variables.
• Identify high-exposure zones or tasks requiring priority control.
• Refine the DPM management plan based on baseline data.

Equipment Installation and Transition Phase (Weeks 2–8)

• Implement planned controls (ventilation upgrades, equipment relocation, job rotation).
• Conduct verification monitoring 2–4 weeks after control implementation.
• If results show >50% reduction in exposure, controls are tracking as expected.
• If results show <25% reduction or no improvement, escalate controls (additional ventilation, equipment upgrade, temporary work suspension in high-exposure zones).

Steady-State Operational Phase (Weeks 8–Project Completion)

• Maintain ongoing monitoring (monthly area, quarterly personal) to ensure sustained compliance.
• Continue equipment maintenance and ventilation system upkeep.
• Monitor for any changes in equipment fleet, ventilation system condition, or work practices that might increase exposure.

Project Closeout Phase (Last 2 Weeks)

• Conduct final monitoring to document that DPM controls remain effective.
• Provide departing workers with documentation of their DPM exposure and health monitoring status (if applicable).
• Archive monitoring and control documentation for the client.

Control Measures That Work on Construction Sites

The menu of practical DPM controls available to construction sites varies by environment and equipment type. The most effective sites use a layered approach combining multiple controls.

Equipment Engineering Controls

1. Tier 4 Final Engines and DPF-Equipped Equipment
2. Specify Tier 4 engines for all diesel equipment rental or purchase.
3. Retrofit DPFs to existing diesel equipment if Tier 4 replacement is not immediately available.
4. DPFs reduce exhaust DPM by >95%, directly lowering site exposure.

5. Cost: $5,000–$20,000 per equipment item for retrofit.

6. Battery Electric Equipment

7. Zero-emission battery-powered excavators and concrete pumps are now commercially available.
8. While upfront cost is higher, zero emissions eliminate the DPM source entirely.
9. Suitable for surface construction and near-completion phases of basements.
10. Long-term strategy: BEV equipment should feature in project budgets and fleet planning.

Ventilation and Environmental Controls

1. Enhanced Temporary Ventilation
2. Size ventilation ducting and fans based on equipment volume and heading dimensions, not on arbitrary rules.
3. Install exhaust extraction in addition to intake ventilation (create positive pressure + active exhaust, not intake alone).
4. Clean and inspect ventilation filters weekly; clogged filters reduce effectiveness rapidly.

5. Cost: $5,000–$20,000 for upgraded temporary ventilation system.

6. Source Relocation

7. Move diesel generators, compressors, and other equipment outside the confined work area whenever feasible.
8. If relocation is not possible, position equipment to discharge exhaust away from worker breathing zones.

9. Maintain minimum 10-meter separation between diesel exhaust outlets and worker gathering areas.

10. Barrier Enclosures

11. Temporary enclosures around high-emission equipment (e.g., generator enclosure, compressor shroud) with exhaust ducting to the exterior.
12. Reduces exposure in zones adjacent to the equipment.
13. Cost: $2,000–$8,000 for temporary enclosures.

Work Practice and Administrative Controls

1. Equipment Operating Schedules
2. Coordinate equipment use to minimize simultaneous operation of multiple diesel machines in the same confined zone.
3. If mucking trucks, excavators, and compressors must all operate in a tunnel heading, schedule them in shifts or time windows.

4. Reduces peak exposure even without reducing total hours.

5. Job Rotation

6. Rotate workers between high-exposure and low-exposure tasks to limit cumulative exposure.
7. Particularly effective for roles like excavator operator (high exposure, short duration) rotated with material handlers or supervision roles (lower exposure).

8. Does not eliminate exposure but can reduce individual worker burden.

9. Maintenance Optimization

10. Well-maintained engines produce less DPM than neglected ones.
11. Implement preventive maintenance schedules for all diesel equipment: oil changes, filter replacements, fuel system cleaning.

12. Cost of maintenance is minimal compared to equipment failure or exposure liability.

13. Worker Training and Awareness

14. Educate workers about DPM hazards, the new WEL, and on-site controls.
15. Identify DPM-emitting equipment and establish exclusion zones.
16. Empower workers to report equipment malfunction or inadequate ventilation.

Personal Protective Equipment (Last Resort)

• Supplied-air respirators (not disposable cartridge respirators) are the only effective PPE for DPM exposure.
• Use only as a temporary measure during equipment transitions or in unavoidable high-exposure situations.
• Ensure adequate worker training, fit-testing, and medical clearance before deployment.
• Document circumstances requiring respirator use and duration of use.

Control Effectiveness Hierarchy for Construction Sites

Most effective to least effective:

1. Eliminate diesel equipment (use battery electric alternatives).
2. Tier 4 engines + enhanced ventilation.
3. DPF retrofit + enhanced ventilation.
4. Ventilation improvements alone (limited effectiveness).
5. Job rotation and scheduling (useful for lower exposures).
6. Respirators (temporary, high inconvenience, low acceptance on worksites).

Special Considerations for Tunnelling Projects

Tunnelling projects are the bellwether of DPM compliance in Australian construction. These large-scale, long-duration projects have the highest DPM exposure and the greatest compliance complexity. Operators of other diesel-heavy indoor environments — such as warehouses and transport depots — face similar obligations.

Tunnelling-Specific DPM Hazards

1. Cumulative Equipment Concentration: A typical tunnelling operation might have an excavator, mucking trucks, a shotcrete rig, a rock bolting jumbo, compressors, and a personnel carrier all operating in or near a single tunnel heading. Cumulative emissions in a 50-100 meter2 area create extreme concentrations.

2. Ventilation System Design: Tunnelling ventilation is typically a temporary ducting system (intake and exhaust) sized to meet minimum air change standards (e.g., 10 air changes per hour). However, these standards were developed for personnel safety and heat management, not DPM dilution. Many tunnelling sites operate with under-sized ventilation relative to diesel equipment load.

3. Extended Duration: Tunnelling headings operate continuously (single or double shift) for weeks or months. Cumulative worker exposure is enormous compared to short-duration construction phases.

4. Rock Excavation Products: Dust from blasting and mechanical excavation combines with diesel exhaust, creating a complex aerosol that raises total respirable dust load (not just DPM).

DPM Compliance Strategy for Tunnelling

1. Front-load Equipment Specification: Before mobilisation, commit to Tier 4 Final equipment for all diesel machinery. Do not plan retrofits mid-project; specify it upfront.

2. Ventilation Upgrade from Day 1: Install enhanced temporary ventilation (larger fans, cleaner exhaust extraction) from the beginning, not as a retrofit. Standard tunnelling ventilation is inadequate for the new DPM limit.

3. Early Baseline Monitoring: Conduct personal and area DPM monitoring in the first 2–3 weeks of headings work. Use baseline data to identify peak exposure points and workers.

4. Monthly Verification: Monthly DPM sampling throughout the tunnelling phase (not just a one-off baseline). Trends show whether controls are holding or degrading over time.

5. Quarterly Personal Monitoring: For high-risk roles (excavator operator, mucking truck driver, shotcrete operator), quarterly personal exposure samples.

6. Engagement with Regulators: Large tunnelling projects (Sydney Metro, Melbourne Metro) are now engaging with relevant regulators (NSW Resources Regulator, Victorian WorkSafe) to develop site-specific compliance agreements. Proactive engagement is safer and more efficient than reactive compliance.

7. BEV Pilot Programs: Consider piloting battery electric excavators or personnel carriers on a section of tunnelling to generate performance data and build organizational capability in BEV operation.

Cost Allocation in Tunnelling Budgets

DPM compliance in tunnelling will add to project cost:

• Equipment specifications (Tier 4 or DPF): +5–10% of equipment capital cost or rental fees.
• Enhanced ventilation: +$200,000–$500,000 for a major project.
• Monitoring program: +$100,000–$200,000 over the project duration.
• Worker health monitoring: +$50,000–$100,000 (depending on workforce size).

Total cost: $400,000–$1M for a major tunnelling contract. This is significant but must be factored into project budgeting and risk pricing.

FAQ: DPM Monitoring on Construction Sites

Q1: Our site is on the surface, not in a tunnel. Does the new DPM limit apply?

Yes, the new 0.01 mg/m³ WEL applies to all workplaces and all workers with potential DPM exposure, surface or underground. However, risk is lower on surface sites if ventilation is unobstructed. If your site has diesel generators, compressors, or concrete pumps, workers downwind can experience elevated exposure. Even surface sites should conduct at least baseline monitoring to confirm exposure is below the WEL. If you’re using equipment rental services, specify Tier 4 Final equipment to minimize risk.

Q2: We rent our equipment from a major hire company. Are they responsible for DPM compliance?

Equipment rental companies provide the machinery, not occupational health management. As the site employer, you are responsible for assessing DPM hazards and implementing controls. You can request Tier 4 equipment from hire companies (most now have Tier 4 fleets available), but you must also manage ventilation, work practices, and monitoring on-site. Include DPM compliance requirements in your hire contracts.

Q3: We conducted DPM monitoring last year and passed. Do we need to do it again?

If the site environment, equipment fleet, ventilation system, and worker roles are all unchanged, and monitoring was comprehensive (multiple personal and area samples across high-risk tasks), repeat monitoring may not be necessary annually. However, best practice is quarterly monitoring during ongoing high-exposure work, or new baseline monitoring if any significant changes occur (equipment replacement, ventilation upgrade, new task introduction). Don’t rely on year-old data if the site has evolved.

Q4: Can we simply tell workers to avoid standing downwind of exhaust?

Administrative controls (job positioning, awareness) are part of a control strategy, but they are not sufficient on their own for the new WEL. The WHS Act requires that employers eliminate or minimize hazards “so far as reasonably practicable.” This means implementing engineering controls (ventilation, equipment upgrades) as a primary defense, not relying on worker behavior alone. Telling workers to avoid exhaust is necessary but not sufficient.

Q5: What if we can’t afford Tier 4 equipment on our budget?

Tier 4 equipment is now the market standard for new equipment and rental fleets, so the cost premium is smaller than it was 5–10 years ago. DPF retrofits on existing equipment cost $5,000–$20,000 per machine but reduce emissions by 95%. For a construction project, the cost of retrofits or Tier 4 specification is typically <1% of total project cost but ensures compliance and protects workers. Budget constraints are not a valid reason to defer compliance; if you cannot afford controls, you cannot safely operate the site. Escalate to project sponsors and secure additional budget allocation.

Q6: We’re starting a 18-month basement excavation next month. What should we specify in the site DPM plan?

Develop a formal Site-Specific DPM Management Plan before mobilisation that includes: (1) All planned diesel equipment with Tier rating and specifications; (2) Ventilation system design with technical specifications and maintenance schedule; (3) Baseline DPM monitoring plan (timing, roles, number of samples); (4) Ongoing monitoring frequency (monthly area, quarterly personal for high-risk roles); (5) Triggers for escalated controls (if baseline exceeds 0.05 mg/m³, implement immediate enhancement); (6) Equipment maintenance procedures; (7) Worker induction content covering DPM; (8) Health monitoring coordination for at-risk workers; (9) Budget allocation ($100,000–$200,000 for a major project). Share the plan with the client, safety regulator, and all site contractors. This up-front planning ensures compliance from day one.

How Anitech Supports Construction Site DPM Compliance

Construction projects face unique DPM challenges: temporary sites, mixed equipment, short timelines, and often, limited health and safety resources on-site. Anitech Group has conducted DPM assessments and compliance support on tunnelling, basement, and piling projects across Australia.

We can assist with:

• Site-specific DPM management plans: Develop a monitoring and control strategy tailored to your project timeline and equipment fleet.
• Baseline and ongoing monitoring: Personal and area DPM sampling, with rapid reporting and trend analysis.
• Equipment specification and procurement: Guidance on Tier 4 vs. retrofit options, and sourcing of equipment for your project.
• Ventilation assessment: Evaluation of existing temporary ventilation and recommendations for enhancement.
• Worker health monitoring coordination: Liaison with occupational physicians for baseline and periodic health assessments as required.
• Regulatory engagement: Consultation on compliance strategies and interaction with relevant state regulators (NSW WorkSafe, Victorian WorkSafe, etc.).

Working on a tunnelling or basement project? Contact Anitech for a site-specific DPM assessment and compliance roadmap. Our team has worked with major contractors and project developers to achieve compliance on Australia’s largest construction sites.

---

Internal Links

• Comprehensive DPM monitoring guide
• New 2026 workplace exposure limit for diesel particulate
• DPM monitoring in underground mining operations

---

Anitech Group is a leading Australian occupational hygiene consultancy specialising in compliance assessment, exposure monitoring, and health risk management across mining, construction, and manufacturing sectors. We help Australian workplaces understand and manage diesel particulate matter exposure under current and emerging regulations.